<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Careful where You Point that Thing</title> <atom:link href="http://johnkivus.com/2010/02/10/careful-where-you-point-that-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://johnkivus.com/2010/02/10/careful-where-you-point-that-thing/</link> <description>I Love Being Taken by Photographs</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>By: John MacPherson</title><link>http://johnkivus.com/2010/02/10/careful-where-you-point-that-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link> <dc:creator>John MacPherson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnkivus.com/?p=112#comment-74</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;The stamp photo example (Gaylord V The United States) is rather interesting. A quote from the judgement reads:
&quot;Mr. Alli [the photographer], through his photographic talents,
transformed this expression and message, creating a surrealistic
environment with snow and subdued lighting where the viewer is left
unsure whether he is viewing a photograph of statues or actual human beings&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does this imply that a less talented photographer will be MORE liable
because the derivative work they create, through the lack of
appropriate skill, is MORE like the original?  Which the lobs the whole matter into the murkily grey area of defining &#039;skill&#039; as an artist. Seems to me the implications of the Gaylord V TUSA case are more far-reaching than they appear at face value. Mind you I&#039;m not a lawyer so what do I know! I might be an artist though, but it seems I&#039;d need a court judgment to decide for sure.&lt;/p&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stamp photo example (Gaylord V The United States) is rather interesting. A quote from the judgement reads:
&#8220;Mr. Alli [the photographer], through his photographic talents,
transformed this expression and message, creating a surrealistic
environment with snow and subdued lighting where the viewer is left
unsure whether he is viewing a photograph of statues or actual human beings&#8221;</p><p>Does this imply that a less talented photographer will be MORE liable
because the derivative work they create, through the lack of
appropriate skill, is MORE like the original?  Which the lobs the whole matter into the murkily grey area of defining &#8216;skill&#8217; as an artist. Seems to me the implications of the Gaylord V TUSA case are more far-reaching than they appear at face value. Mind you I&#8217;m not a lawyer so what do I know! I might be an artist though, but it seems I&#8217;d need a court judgment to decide for sure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              7b39d
Template:           index
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/18 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 449/467 objects using disk: basic

Served from: johnkivus.com @ 2012-05-19 23:40:54 -->
